top of page

Portfolio Statistics Dashboard Redesign

Type: Web Application | Role: UI/UX Designer & Business Analyst | Project: Digital Platform Reporting

The Portfolio Statistics Dashboard Redesign modernized a legacy reporting interface that had become difficult to use and visually outdated. Originally built as a dense, table-heavy view of initiative totals, the tool lacked clarity, consistency, and responsiveness to user needs.

This redesign transformed the dashboard into a more interactive, filterable, and visual experience—designed to help teams quickly interpret key metrics, review progress across priorities, and export relevant data for leadership and operational reporting.

Deliverables: High-fidelity Figma mockups, Lucid Chart, Snagit, interactive filters, modular layouts

Problem Statement

The original statistics dashboard offered limited usability and little visual distinction between key metrics. Users struggled to interpret initiative counts, delivery status, and scope changes. Filter behavior was inconsistent, and exports required heavy manual editing.

These issues made it hard for teams to align reporting, communicate progress, or trust the data they were working with—especially when preparing updates for leadership.

Possible Solution

Redesign the dashboard with a more modern, user-friendly layout that includes:
 

  • A Quick Metrics Summary for initiative totals and delivery breakdowns

  • Visual indicators for delivery health (e.g., Early, On-Time, Late)

  • Priority-based grouping of initiatives

  • Filtering by Team, Owner, and Portfolio

  • A toggle between table and chart views to accommodate different users

  • Help text and hover tooltips to clarify metric definitions

  • Export features that mirror the on-screen filtered data

Target Audience

  • End-to-End Technology Delivery Lead

  • Business Owner

  • Executive Sponsor

  • Development Lead

  • Product Manager

  • Product Lead

  • Product Owner

  • Portfolio Manager

  • Program Manager

  • Project Manager

The Approach

  • Conducted interviews with stakeholders across different teams and roles

  • Audited the existing dashboard for visual and interaction gaps

  • Mapped out user flows based on common reporting tasks

  • Created low-fidelity wireframes to test new visual hierarchies

  • Built interactive Figma prototypes with filter logic and export options

  • Validated designs through testing sessions and refined based on feedback

  • Collaborated with developers to ensure seamless integration into the Portfolio Reporting Platform

Gradient Background

Design Thinking Process

This project followed a user-centered approach focused on clarity, consistency, and confidence. The five design thinking stages guided the work:

Empathize

User Research
User Interview
Entrant Analysis

Define

User Persona
User Jouney Map
Goal Statement
Empathy Map

Ideate

Brainstorming
Card Sorting
User Flow

Design

Paper Wireframes
Visual Design
Prototype

Test

Check Usability
Survey Insight
Improvements

Foggy Lake

Key Insight Derived

  • Over 40% of users only applied one filter due to confusion

  • Export was the most-used feature, yet required manual reformatting

  • New users had higher drop-off rates due to lack of clarity

  • Visual summaries outperformed data tables in engagement metrics

Sources

  • Usage analytics from the Portfolio Reporting Platform

  • Internal feedback channels and team reporting discussions

  • Export activity logs and filter selection data

Quantitative Research

  • Analyzed filter usage logs, export frequencies, and bounce rates

  • Reviewed feedback from regular team syncs and reporting sessions

Empathize Phase

Qualitative Research

Interviewed reporting analysts, delivery leads, and business-facing roles across various teams who used the statistics dashboard regularly.

Interview Questions

  • What metrics do you rely on most from this dashboard?

  • What frustrates you when trying to filter or export data?

  • How do you explain the data to stakeholders?

  • What would help you find insights faster?

  • Do you prefer data tables or visuals? Why?

Foggy Lake
Foggy Lake
Foggy Lake
Foggy Lake

Key Insight Derived

  • Users wanted simplified layouts with fewer redundant rows

  • Many relied on manual exports and formatting in spreadsheets

  • Visual tags like Late or On-Time were frequently requested

  • Filtering behavior was unpredictable and sometimes caused users to restart reports

Define Phase

User Persona

This group includes product leaders, program coordinators, and planning analysts who rely on quantitative metrics to drive decisions, track performance, and align portfolios with delivery expectations. They use dashboard data regularly to inform progress reviews, identify risks, and prepare executive summaries. These users expect quick, scannable summaries with visual cues and the ability to toggle between charts and tables depending on context.
 

  • Primary Goals:

    • Understand portfolio-level performance at a glance

    • Share progress metrics with teams and leadership

  • Pain Points:

    • Dense, outdated tables with unclear logic

    • Inefficient filtering and export workflows

  • Needs:

    • Clean, visual metric summaries

    • Priority-based grouping

    • Export and filtering behavior that mirrors user input

Selfie Portrait

Tom Chiang

Age: 40s - 50s

Education: MBA in Technology Strategy

Status: Married

Occupation: Product Ower

Location: Dallas, TX

Personality

  • Strategic

  • Analytical

  • Data-Driven

Breif Story

Tom prepares monthly reports that consolidate delivery and performance data across portfolios. He prefers quick visual snapshots but also needs the ability to drill into data for specific discussions.

Goals

  • Summarize initiative performance clearly for leadership

  • Filter and export data quickly for team-specific updates

Frustations

  • Dense tables make insight discovery slow

  • Lack of consistent metric definitions

Needs

Visual grouping, summary tags, and exportable filters

Motivations

Improve stakeholder trust and reporting turnaround time

Image by Jake Nackos

Lynette Smith

Age: 30s - 40s

Education: B.S. in Operations Management

Status: Single

Occupation: Business Analyst

Location: Phoenix, AZ

Personality

  • Detail-Oriented

  • Independent

  • Goal-Focused

Breif Story

Lynette manages initiative tracking for multiple portfolios. She’s constantly pulling data into custom views to align with internal planning tools.
 

Goals

  • Understand initiative breakdown by team and owner

  • Avoid redundant work when preparing reports

Frustations

  • Filters don’t persist between sessions

  • Metrics aren’t clearly explained in the interface

Needs

Consistent filtering and contextual help

Motivations

Build efficient, repeatable reporting workflows

Empathy Map

Says

"I just want to know what’s late, what’s changed, and who owns it.”

Thinks

“How do I explain this without needing to reformat everything?”

Does

Logs in weekly, filters by priority, exports to share with leadership

Feels

Frustrated when things aren’t intuitive, confident when the layout flows well

Selfie Portrait

Task Flow

The Process of Portfolio Statistics Dashboard

Click on Portfolio Insights & Statistics
Select the Portfolio Story Board Dashboard
Select Filters
Review top table metrics
Export
Log into Dashboard
Dashboard Homepage
Go to Menu

Low-Fidelity Wireframe

Clouds in the Sky
PT STATS WIREFRAME.png

Typography & Colors

Font Used:

Open Sans|

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

1234567890

The Open Sans font is a popular choice for websites and user interfaces because of its excellent readability and neutral, friendly appearance. That’s why I chose to use this font.

Open Sans Bold

Open Sans Regular

Color Used

Primary Color

#0470B2

Secondary Color

#72A9CF

Text Color

#000000

Text Color

#6b6b6b

BG Color

#DBDDF1

Visual Design

Blue Gradient Background
Anna's Portfolio Visual Design - Storyboard Visual.png
Untitled design (13).png
bottom of page